This month's Last Word is by Ploy Radford, Editor, HealthInvestor.
Government needs to take its cue on social care funding from outside Westminster
At the end of last year the national papers were getting excited over the government’s announcement that councils could raise taxes by 6% over the next two fiscal years to fund social care. To kick off the New Year, Surrey Council decided to show all and sundry exactly what an ineffectual amount it thought it was and confirmed that it in fact planned to raise council tax by 15%.
David Hodge, the leader of the Conservative council, said: “Demand for adults’ social care, learning disabilities and children’s services is increasing every year. So I regret, despite us finding £450 million worth of savings from our annual budget, we have no choice but to propose the increase in council tax.”
Of course this raise beyond the government cap on acceptable tax increases means the council will have to hold a referendum on the matter, and residents are unlikely to vote for the increase. The move is in all likelihood a publicity stunt to illustrate how dire the social care funding situation is, and no doubt to take the heat off the council when they inevitably have to cut services.
Whatever your view on the Surrey’s move, when a Conservative council tells the Conservative government that they need to do more through such a drastic method, you know things have gotten really bad. Which doesn’t exactly bode well for 2017.
Arguably the most prominent way in which the funding crisis makes itself apparent is through staffing shortages. Recruiting and, crucially, retaining workers is one of the hardest challenges a provider faces and vacancies and churn just push costs up. Convincing people to carry out the tiring and far from glamorous task of caring for the elderly and the infirm for minimum wage is tough. You can earn the same wage and have a simpler work life stacking shelves at the local supermarket.
Recent research by law firm Charles Russell Speechlys (CRS) has suggested that one way to entice workers away from supermarket aisles and into care homes is to adopt an English equivalent of the Scottish carers living wage. From 1 October 2016, carers of all ages in Scotland had to be paid a minimum wage of £8.25 an hour. The national living wage is £7.20 an hour and only for those aged 25 and over.
Of course, for this to work for providers, CRS points out, it needs to be part funded by government. As Surrey Council and the existence of a Scottish carers living wage highlight however, government appear to be deaf to what the rest of the country is saying about social care. It looks like to ensure the whole country gets a fair funding deal then, bigger publicity stunts may be needed in 2017.